 |
| Let's fix it! |
Their important insight is that the Bipartisan Policy Center, Brookings Institution, Commonwealth Fund, Kaiser Family Foundation, the National Coalition on Health Care, Partnership for Sustainable Health Care and Urban Institute all have a remarkable degree of overlap in their recommendations for the next phases of health reform.
Most of these expert organizations agree on the merits of value-based payment as well as insurance reform (pay for quality), information technology, competition, tort reform, evidence-based benefit design (paying when there's evidence that it works), workforce changes (greater efficiency), reforming Medicare, changing tax policy (the exemption for health insurance) and instituting regional or local caps (stick to a budget or there's consequences).
The DMCB wholeheartedly agrees and hopes that the bipartisan consensus evident among these think-tank institutions leads Congress (if not this one, the next) and the President (if not this one....) to use these ingredients to build on the successes and correct the many deficiencies of the Affordable Care Act.
And the lapse?
Jack Lewin et al were missing one thing. The DMCB looked in each of these organizations' web sites and found that there was also considerable support for population health management.
To wit:
The Bipartisan Policy Center - while the emphasis of this report is on health information technology, the real dividends are pretty clear when it mentions "population health" 14 times:
This plan should address the development and adoption of policies and standards needed for the delivery of care, the empowerment of individuals, and improvements in population health based on national health and health care priorities.
The Commonwealth Fund:
Effective population health management requires fundamental change in care delivery that must be supported by changes in payment.
National Coalition
Real reform means engaging consumers in their own health and health care choices. In both Medicare and too many private plans today, benefit design neither supports self-management of chronic disease nor distinguishes between care that is effective and care that is not.
Partnership for Sustainable Health Care - see page 22:
Federal nurse education funding should be refocused to equip registered nurses to assume the roles of case manager and population health coordinator.
The Urban Institute - see page 17 on the topic of Medicaid reform:
States can start in select geographic areas or specific population groups (adults and children or specific chronic conditions), and then incrementally expand them after learning from experience and making program improvements and adjustments. Broader efforts typically mean additional stakeholders, increased collaboration and communication.
